In Serch of Eden
Comments & Ratings
Author | Rating | Date | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
SandDemon |
Oct 24, 2007 | ||
ChubbyTeletubby |
Apr 9, 2006 | Huh. An interesting story, to say the least. Rife with spelling errors, riddled with completely unlikely happenings, and...ever heard of PARAGRAPHS? I mean, you didn't even spell the title right. Come on. Still, underneath all of this, there was a story that was pretty enjoyable. I've heard the theories you put forward in this story before, they are nothing new, but it's still fun to see other points of views besides evolution all the time. And you have some writing ability, if you would only run a quick SPELL CHECK and BREAK UP your pages. SHEESH! |
|
jeffisthebest |
Feb 27, 2006 | A lot of words with nothing important | |
michaelrayholt |
Aug 15, 2005 | The spelling mistakes and simplicity hurt you, but the glaring Biblical errors hurt you MORE. For example: the Bible never says how many cherubim (plural of cherub) were placed at the east of the garden of Eden, but you assume seven. Nice number, but insupportable. Also, you assume that since the cherubim were placed east of the garden, that that is the only entrance... also insupportable. God just drove them out west and they knew better than to come back that way. But your biggest flaw was assuming the garden exists in modern times, when the garden was most likely destroyed in the flood. In fact, the Bible itself says that the Tree of Life (the only recorded garden survivor) is in the New Jerusalem, which has yet to descend to the New Earth from Heaven (peruse Revelation 21 & 22). Sorry, but this story is too much bunk to pass off all at once, SavedbyGrace. |
|
donteatpoop |
Jun 24, 2005 | Intrigueing idea that's presented well. Normaly spelling and grammatical errors don't bother me, but these are a bit overwhelming. Also alot of the choices, if not all, are no-brainers. Obviously the story continues if you do this and ends if you do that. Needs edited. The premis is flawless, and the storyline is awesome. It's just the details and choices that detract from the petential brilliance of this piece. | |
rebubula |
May 14, 2004 | ||
whateveristrue |
Apr 11, 2004 | a few typos but otherwise a interesting idea on a thrilling topic! |